Yes it was dark in Croydon 50 years ago !

The Croydon Astronomical Society

Light Pollution

Updated 24th June 2007

Progress in controlling Light Pollution in the Croydon Area

Light Pollution wastes our finite energy resources - it will take 4.3 years for lights shining upwards to arrive at the nearest star and there is unlikely to be anyone there who wants it !

Update 13th October 2006

The DEFRA guidance on the provisions in The Cleaner Neighbourhoods & Environment Act on 'Light as a Statutory Nuisance' introduced in April 2006 can be found here on the DEFRA web site.

Update 12th October 2006

If you want to measure how bad the light pollution is at your observing location have a look at the Skyobjects site. The only problem is that you need to take some images at a site where there is very little light pollution and also require that you have a SBIG camera. A more general version is on Stan Moore's website here.

Update 2nd September 2006

It's not only Croydon that has a problem with light pollution - have a look here for my experiences with Light Trespass & Light Pollution from street lights in the adjacent London Borough of Sutton.

Update 18th June 2006   ---      Globe at Night - Global Light Pollution Survey - 2006 and 2007

March 8 - 21, 2007

after dark

Globe at night - Worldwide Light pollution survey - aimed at Students but also seems to accept results from other groups. The survey looks at the number of stars visible in Orion and has a simulator that shows the effects of different levels of limiting magnitude. A similar event was held in 2006 ( and kept quite enough that we did not notice !). Results from the previous event and details of the 2007 event on the globe website here.

Update 29th April 2006

Not directly related to Croydon or the UK but The American National Parks Service are concerned about the impact of light pollution on the National Parks in the USA. One interesting statement quoted is that they can see the effects of light pollution from cities 300 miles away. More details on the National Park Service Natural Lightscapes Monitoring & Data page. This page has a description of the method they employ to monitor light pollution, this system is calibrated by the use of intensity measurements of stars in the image.

Update 1st April 2006

Further Research has confirmed that the clause (section 102) in the Clean Neighbourhoods & Environment Act 2005 relating to making light pollution a Statutory Nuisance under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 will come into force on the 6th April 2006. The document showing when sections are expected to come into effect is located on the DEFRA web site here. More important the guidance on the application of the new law is here on the DEFRA Web site.

The first point of contact for enforcement is your Local Authorities Environmental Protection Department. If they fail to take action you can bring a private prosecution for Nuisance under (s) 82 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990. Let us know how you get on !

Purley Way Lighting & Croydon Airport

One could say that Croydon was the leader in light pollution from roads - the road past Croydon Airport 'The Purley Way' (A23) was the first road to be lit with Sodium Street Lights in the country. These were installed by Phillips in 1932. The section to the North of the Airport was lit slightly later with lamps suspended from wires above the centre of the road. I can vaguely remember these from my childhood when we drove across the road on our way home. At the time they seemed very bright compared with the lights in the surrounding major roads. I suppose we would hardly notice they were on against the sky glow today. A bit of the history of the Sodium Street lights on the Purley Way can be seen on the Lamptech website. Also of local light pollution interest is that Croydon Airport used to have a lighthouse or visual beacon mounted on the tower of the waterworks opposite the aerodrome. I have not seen any details of this on the web but have a vague recollection of seeing the beam from my Grandparents house in South Croydon one night.

Update Tuesday 21st March 2006.

It appears that the clause (section 102) in the Clean Neighbourhoods & Environment Act 2005 relating to making light pollution a Statutory Nuisance under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 will come into force on the 6th April 2006 according to information here on the CPRE web site. The government were going to publish guidance for Local Environmental Health Officers but at this time it does not appear to be on the government web sites.

Remember:

Clause 102 of the Bill amends section 79 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 to include ‘artificial light emitted from premises so as to be prejudicial to health or a nuisance’. Subsection (4) lists those premises that are excluded:

• airports

• harbour premises

• railway premises

• tramway premises

• a bus station and any associated facilities

• a public service vehicle operating centre

• a goods vehicle operating centre

• a lighthouse

• a prison

That means you can't complain about the awful lights on the Croydon Tramlink Stops ( assuming  tram stops are tramway premises in Law). The situation with street lighting is very unclear there seems to be a debate if a street is a premise or not - if it is proved to be a premise one can have the interesting effect of one part of the council investigating another for braking the act. If the council does not wish to act it is possible to take out a private prosecution in a magistrates court under the Environmental Protection Act. - an interesting challenge ! To succeed you would need to prove that a street is in fact a premise and that the artificial light emitted from premises is prejudicial to health or a nuisance.

Section 79 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 ( That is modified by S102 of the Clean Neighbourhoods & Environment Act 2005) defines premises as ' "premises" includes land and, subject to subsection (12) below, any vessel; '. This MAY be sufficient to define streets (that are built on land) as premises for the purpose of light pollution - a response from legal experts would be appreciated.

If anyone has any more information on successful prosecutions, publication of the guidance or a legal precedent that makes a road as a premise please let me know.

John Murrell - details on our contacts page.

A small success in the fight against light pollution in the area of our observatory has been the inclusion of a section about light pollution in the Supplemental Planning Guidance for Kenley Aerodrome. The relevant section is as follows:

'2.2.4 Local Views and Light Pollution

Views into and out of the airfield should be protected and enhanced. Excessive lighting associated with any new developments could detract from the character of the Conservation Area and could seriously affect the operation of the observatory to the west of the airfield.'

The complete document can be found here.

Update Monday, October 31, 2005

Consultation on ' Draft Guidance on the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005'

DEFRA have issued draft guidance on the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005 which includes a section on how to apply the 'Light Pollution' section of the act when it becomes law. The paper is at http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/clean-neighbourhood05/consultation-cleanenv.pdf .

More details on the consultation process are here: http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/clean-neighbourhood05/ . You will note that they have not even bothered to consult The Croydon Astronomical Society despite the fact that we submitted evidence to the Parliamentary Select Committee's investigation into Light Pollution and Astronomy (See below). If you wish to comment on the guidance follow the instructions on the DEFRA page, please note that the guidance cannot change the law as written in the act. The guidance is an interpretation of the act and cannot conflict with it however there is room for some changes to be encouraged. In the end of the day it is of course up to the courts to interpret what the act says.

When the consultation on the guidance is complete - responses are required by Monday 2nd January 2006, the final guidance will then be published at an unspecified date and then the appropriate sections of the act will become law when the Secretary of State gets round to making the order ! It was originally suggested that the section on Light Pollution would come into effect in April 2006 but it will be interesting to see if this happens. See the guidance at http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/localenv/leqbill/commencement-qa.pdf

Light Pollution is included in the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act

It appears that the Governments 'Clean Neighbourhoods & Environments Bill' has been passed by Parliament and has received Royal Assent. However while some of the sections will come into effect in the next few weeks the majority of the bill including the section that makes light pollution a 'Statutory nuisance' require the government ( whoever that may be !) to issue an order before they take effect. The official view of the date on the DEFRA web site is as follows:

"Q. When will the other measures in the Act come into effect?

A. We are aiming for the other measures in the Act to come into effect in 2006, once all the necessary guidance and regulations have been produced. The exact date will be a decision for the new Government formed after the general election, but is unlikely to be any earlier than April 2006."

So we may have to wait another year !

More details here from the DEFRA web site.

Proposal that Light Pollution is included in the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Bill

The government have proposed that Light Pollution should be included in the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Bill presently before Parliament. While this is a step in the right direction the proposed bill contains a number of exceptions that could result in considerable dilution of the effectiveness of these controls.

The proposed changes to the Environment Bill are shown below.

While there are good reasons for the proposed exempt premises to require lighting there is no reason that they cannot employ lighting that is not prejudicial to health or a nuisance. For instance on the light pollution maps of the UK one of the darkest places in the West of London are the runways at Heathrow Airport. However considerable light pollution is visible from the terminals. There may be an argument for these premises to have a temporary exemption to allow them to get their houses in order.. If you are not happy with these exemptions the best thing you can do is to write to your local MP expressing your views. As the bill is in progress it is important that you write soon.

London at night from the ISS - Note the M25, Dark Runways at Heathrow and Gatwick Airport to the South. The Diffuse areas are caused by cloud.

Image courtesy of the Image Science & Analysis Laboratory, NASA Johnson Space Centre.                                                   Website (http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov)

 

John Murrell

 

Statutory nuisance: lighting

 

(1)   

Section 79 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 is amended as follows.

 

(2)   

In subsection (1) (matters constituting statutory nuisances) after paragraph (fa)

 


 

Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Bill
Part 9 — Miscellaneous

 

 

 

(as inserted by section 101(2)) insert—

 

“(fb)   

artificial light emitted from premises so as to be prejudicial to

 

health or a nuisance;”.

 

(3)   

In subsection (2) (exception from subsection (1)(b) and (g) for premises

 

occupied for defence purposes) after “Subsection (1)(b)” insert “, (fb)”.

 

(4)   

After subsection (5A) (as inserted by section 101(3)) insert—

 

“(5B)   

Subsection (1)(fb) does not apply to artificial light emitted from—

 

(a)   

an airport;

 

(b)   

harbour premises;

 

(c)   

railway premises, not being relevant separate railway premises;

 

(d)   

tramway premises;

 

(e)   

a bus station and any associated facilities;

 

(f)   

a public service vehicle operating centre;

 

(g)   

a goods vehicle operating centre;

 

(h)   

a lighthouse;

 

(i)   

a prison.”

 

 

The Science & Technology Committee of The House of Commons inquiry into light pollution and astronomy has now been published.

 The report from the committee together with copies of both the written & verbal evidence can be found using the following links.

Report Home Page, with links to PDF file. Report in HTML Page and link to written evidence and Written Evidence.

You can see a copy of the CAS submission in the Written Evidence section of the committee web site.

The following is a summary of the report – there are a lot more details in the full report.

ã House of Commons Reproduced from the Committee Report

DEFRA issued a consultation ‘Paper Living Places - Powers, Rights, Responsibilities’ with a response due by the 14th February 2003.  The consultation document can be found here. Look for Section F4, Dealing with nuisance lighting pages 39 and 40.

We submitted a response to this document.

Petition to The European Council

The following is intended for Chairmen / Committees of UK Astronomical Societies

The EMAIL below was circulated requesting astronomical societies to petition the European Council to issue a directive to reduce light pollution.

Date:   29/01/2003 19:25 PM

RE:     An initiative of the European astro amateurs for the safeguard of the night sky

Dear Sir/ Madame

 

Please find attached an invitation to support the 'Appeal to the European Council' for the safeguard of the night sky to fight light pollution.

Your Association is strongly invited to sign the attached appeal form that should be returned to our postal address within February 15th, 2003. All participant Associations will be kept informed about the discussion with the European Parliament's officials on this specific theme.

 

Kind regards

 

Raffaello Braga

Council Member

Union of the Italian Amateur Astronomers

http://www.uai.it

email: rafbraga@tin.it

Attached draft Appeal Form   Microsoft Word Format     RTF Format     PDF Format

Read The Croydon Astronomical Society Response

The Nestlé Building – Croydon

One major local source of Light Pollution

 

Light Beam on the clouds from West Croydon

This is why it is called ‘Croydon Skylight’ !

 

Croydon in common with much of England suffers badly from light pollution. While we are working with Croydon Skyline in an attempt to minimise the light pollution in Croydon it still appears to be growing. It is normally quite difficult to identify individual problems however The Nestlé Tower in Croydon is one clear example of how bad poor lighting can be. The Nestlé Tower lighting is relatively easy to identify as the colour of the lights changes and they are turned off at around midnight so it is possible to identify the source. The pictures on this page have been taken by CAS member Peter Bruce who lives in West Croydon. The first picture shows the illumination on the clouds from his house. Just in case you think that light pollution is a local problem the illumination on the clouds has been observed from both Carshalton (3 Miles Away) and from Bromley ( about 8 miles away). The lights quite clearly illuminate clouds at 7,000 feet !The second picture shows the reason for the problem, the building it lit with upward pointing floodlights. As the fascia of the building is quite reflective being made of glass & light coloured concrete a large proportion of the light bounces of the building and heads towards the sky where is causes the effect known locally as ‘Croydon Skylight’ or ‘Croydon Lighthouse’

Peter Bruce is currently discussing the problem with representatives from Nestlé. The CAS are also communicating with them via our representation on Croydon Skyline. Nestlé and their sub-contractors have tried a number of modifications including re-aligning the lights & extra baffles but these do not appear to have made any visible difference. 

As a Society we will continue in our efforts to resolve the problem – perhaps we should reward Nestlé with a CfDS ‘Bad Lighting’ award ! 

View from the Base of the Building showing light on the clouds

Scattered Light from the base of the building

Studies have shown that the Light Pollution in Europe is currently growing at around 10% to 15% per year ! – at this rate it will not be long before it is brighter at night than during the day.

Pictures in this section courtesy Peter Bruce

Measurements of Light Pollution

How bad is it where you live – and how bad will it be if we don’t do something ?
 

Pierantonio Cinzano has been able to measure global light pollution using the data from the American DMSP satellites. Rather than just produce another image of the Earth’s light pollution from space he has calibrated the data and this has enabled him to produce a set of intensity maps. His Web-Site has a number of Papers & Pre-Prints available as well as more intensity maps if you are interested in the details.

He has also researched the growth in light pollution in Italy from 1971 to 1998. While this is frightening enough his prediction for 2025 is truly horrific. It seems by then children may truly ask ‘Daddy what are the stars ?’ It’s up to all of us to ensure that this does not happen !

Measured artificial sky brightness  picture courtesy Pierantonio Cinzano


Keep an eye on our Web Site Updates Page to see when this is modified

text seperator